Want Some Answers ???
Index HomeOur Government and Nation
The New Zealand Labour Government from 2000-08 was the most wicked government we have ever had. But elected for 3 terms (over 9 years) because New Zealand is home of the loony left. And our country are apparently oblivious to what is good moral character. When President Clinton committed lewd conduct in Office, New Zealander's said, "long as he does his job, his private life doesn't matter'. So for Heads of State in public Office they knowingly vote for alcoholics, de facto's, transvestites, homosexuals etc. Clever talkers but morally illiterate. New Zealander's stupidly think their 'personal life doesn't matter". Yet what a person believes has an impact on what they do. So the perverse and immoral rewrite our laws.
The Prostitution Law Reform Bill was promoted by Labour and the Green Party. A private members bill by Labour's Cabinet Minister Tim Barnett (homosexual activist). In parliament when the vote confirmed a law change, they shouted for JOY. Yes our Government, CLAPPED and CHEERED as Prostitution was legalized and liberalized.
So now we have more & younger prostitutes ("20%" under age). This is child abuse. Parliamentarians said restrictions only drive it "underground". A law change would be "Good for their health" and "we must remove the stigma". So the Prostitute Collective also helped Labour to write our laws (they want more brothels, less restrictions). Labour as the 'government' agreed, they obviously don't care if your 16 year old son/daughter visits, or is a prostitute.
No legal status alters the fact it's a form of slavery - a crime against the human body. It promotes crime, exploitation, disease, broken marriages, abortions, child abuse, drugs and ruins lives. It's the old slave-trade with a new face. Only morally bankrupt equate the sale of genitals with the sale of labor. New Zealand now 'leads the world in cases of Syphilis' (Radio NZ National 28/9/04 'News at 12'). Children of prostitutes don't have fathers, they live isolated, shunned lives, they're laughed at and stigmatized. Our Governments want more children like this. So they give significant financial support from taxpayers to the Prostitute's Collective.
As our country becomes more secular, immorality and brothels will increase but so will crime, drug abuse and violence. And when you are sick and shocked with the violence, get ready for more. Nations that turn away from God discover God's goodness is harder to find.
They call themselves "Honorable Members". The parliament prayer opens - "Seeking Thy guidance in all things..." In reality, they seek God's guidance in nothing.
This country is paying an enormous price for broken marriages and families. "120,000" kids growing up without dads. We need special economic benefits to encourage long term MARRIAGE relationships, NOW! All evidence proves male & female parents are best for children and society. Yet our governmental departments ignore the words 'husband/wife' preferring 'care-giver', 'partner'. Our Governments encourage anything dishonoring traditional marriage and families - gambling, alcohol, homosexuality, prostitution, etc. Helen Clark supported and twice attended the homosexual parades which promote indecent and obscene behavior. Why? She said, to "celebrate diversity". Our media gave them free promotion calling them "Hero Parades". Sexual-perverts called 'Heroes' honored by our PM who was disgusted that our troops might serve in Iraq for the freedom of others. What an example for kids, a HOMOSEXUAL ACTIVIST AS PRIME MINISTER FOR NINE YEARS. She "proudly" "encourage" "promotes" and endorses this behaviour as seen in a video This PM New Zealander's voted for and LOVED!! The news media never complained or said a word. Activists talk about "human rights". What nonsense! Walk around a public place, supermarket or street, such people are not distinguished by race, skin colour or clothes. No, this is NOT the acceptance of people but their practice and choice.
(They can and do change http://pfox.org/default.html ask them - exodusnz@maxnet.co.nz They are NOT born that way www.trueorigin.org/gaygene01.asp )
The State should not interfere with the institution of marriage unless to strengthen it. Yet the NZ Labour Party supported the Bill for 'civil unions'. And appointed another homosexual activist (Cabinet Minister Chris Carter) Head of the Select Committee he IGNORED the numerous submissions opposing this bill. Labour in nine years ignored 3 MASSIVE petitions of signatures. When the vote in Parliament past for 'civil unions' Labour and Green's CLAPPED and CHEERED as men kissed each other. The Government then promoted homosexuality by funding TV programs "Queer Nation' and advertising condoms on TV (with public money) ad's featuring young boy's kissing each other.
Yet there was not one march anywhere in this country for civil unions, prostitution, casinos, or lowering drinking age.
Labour changed 180 laws, and still can not convince us such relationships are 'normal'. Imagine a government by law, out to remove all discrimination against homosexuals, transsexuals, and transvestites? And if you break the law, you go to jail. How sick is that?
Clearly Labour wants kids to grow-up confused, ignorant of natural relationships between male and female. With a life of shame and embarrassment with "parents" who are anything but normal. That's child abuse.
The new PM John Key National Party is no better. Only 2 months in the job, he goes to the 'Gay-Day Out' (8 Feb 09). And promises to ignore 'Citizens Initiated Referendum'. Referendum they don't like are always ignored -
1999... 82% voted for a maximum of 99 MPs.... (ignored)
1999... 92% voted for a more victim-centered justice system.. (ignored)
2009... 87% voted for amending the NEW anti-smacking law.... (ignored)
The nameless New Zealand 'Herald On Sunday' Editor scoffed at the 'March for Democracy' and support for the referendum above (21/11/09). Saying "referendum" is 'mob rule' and 'anti-democratic'. After all "both Hitler and Mussolini were populists" (p.97 22/11/09). The Herald Editor is against the right of only some people to speak out. This paper guards its editor, hides their name. And usually they are the most sick minded liberal they can find.
It will get worse!!
Labour appointed a homosexual activist as Minister of Education! He previously worked as an examiner for the Video Recording Office assessing porn films. He wrote to me,
"I teach my children that it doesn't matter who they form a relationship with...That is the kind of New Zealand I am fighting for. I will continue to do so despite your protests...."
How intolerant is that? He wants that kind of behaviour among children. Helen Clark called him a 'hard working and conscientious member'. But if it "doesn't matter who" what about incest, cousins, prostitutes, under age, animals? Nothing is wrong if it "doesn't matter who". He said -
"I utterly reject your right to judge me or anyone else like me...."
So he denies my human 'rights'. Isn't that discrimination? Next step is jail those who disagree! At this time, the public funded 'National Radio' even introduced queer-talking commentators, Mr O'Bryan, & Mr Martin. They sounded absurd.
Anti-smacking: Today we have legalized child-abuse by treating kids like adults, in relationships, sexualized clothes and adult underwear. The Green's and Labour's anti-smacking legislation is anti-parent. They say smacking causes kids to "grow up violent". They never complained about teaching kids wresting, judo, or karate. All physical correction today is considered wrong politically incorrect, whether corporal, capital, smacking or jail.
Yet the fact is justice MUST be seen to be done by law, regardless of forgiveness or mercy. Any nation with a low severity of punishments will develop higher levels of crime. Removing punishment doesn't help offenders, it removes boundaries. Lawlessness impacts our country's tourism far MORE than a child corrected by a smack. A smack is not cruel. Punishment without Christian principles is cruel, abusive and ineffective. So today it's absurd: Parents mustn't smack children for correction (considered violence), yet unborn babies can be killed for convenience (not considered murder). This says it all -
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QfrwuBxc5w8
Its nonsense to think we are civilized by relaxing correction or punishment. The end result is injustice. Civilization without justice is atheistic. Atheism has no absolutes, man (regarded as chemicals) is the product of an 'up-bringing' (or born that way) so not responsible, nor should be punished for wrong. If one kills another, it's what's right for them.
Sex Education: Now we have 4 year olds 'playing out adult sex acts in the play ground' (The NZ Herald. p.a9. 9/6/05). Is 'sex education' the answer? Well that started years ago. It targeted teenagers, it had high sounding intentions. It became 'non-judgmental' (not 'imposing views on others'), then became a free condom hand-out. Today its called 'obscenity in the class room.' We're had explicit graphitic comprehensive sex education in schools for years. Why is it that otherwise sexually explicit material (R18 R20) is presented to teenagers in the name of "education"? This is child abuse. Why the need to shock, shame and embarrass kids? The problem of abortions, STD's is increasing, today our stats are almost the world's worst. Why? Family Planning and the National Radio "Panel" insist its because of "the religious conservative" who are critical of contraception. The solution, they say, "more education" and "more condoms" (4/4/07 4:30). So in 2008 school authorities encourage homosexual clubs in schools, promoting this among kids.
Anything considered obscene/offensive today will become acceptable tomorrow.
'Oh no, that would never happen'. Not so, it has already. A proven fact. Once we were shocked!! Its unlawful, then it's tolerated, then it's demanded acceptable by law-changes. Now public money and the Law promote it and would punish those once offended. Note how fashions, magazines and movies have changed over the years? Given this fact, the future is terrifying based on today's trends.
We have problems unknown just 100 years ago. Child abusers often re-offend and victims are likely to abuse others or grow-up hurt and confused. A generation cycle exhibiting similar behavior. If infants lack good role models, or have same sex parents, their brain is severely effected (brainwashed). Brain development is unable to grow and distinguish or learn the fundamentals. Things impossible to be taught by dictatorial instruction. Children model behavior of adults. MANY people already know this and hope to breakdown the fundamentals of a decent society. They know "openness and acceptance" of sexual perversion will cause this breakdown.
The Labour Party also know this. They voted against the family, look at their supporters. "The kind of New Zealand" they were 'fighting for... despite your protests'. Labour's Phil Goff wanted to de-criminalize sexual behavior between 12 & 16 year olds. What are they about? Steve Maharey - "We see this as an historic election. It's the one we hope when we decisively put to bed the conservative vote in this country. We came in to change the direction of the country". Yet they avoid Question Time in the Debating Chamber when in trouble. Sitting Days of the House are few as they trip around the world.
Former Cabinet Minister John Tamihere described his time inside Labour. "If you're a free and independent spirit, very dangerous".... "I tell you what if I was on the other side mate, I'd have cut ^#%!! Labour to pieces over moral issues". The PM was surrounded by lesbians and "a lot of her support systems are". She's "very comfortable in that world". He said Labour was "infiltrated" with feminists and homosexuals. And that effected "key policy and decision making processes....skews things... (and) they are trying to make men think and act like them". It's all "social engineering". Homosexuals "harangue" and "threaten" those who differ. Tamihere said, "I've got a right to think that sex with another male is unhealthy and violating. I've a right to think that". And the Crown? There's no "such a thing as a Crown that exists in NZ constitution..... It's a myth. It's run by prime ministerial dictate, full stop". And the media? "they're utterly and totally useless" with "no investigative journalism..." "in an information age we're got more ignorant people out there than there's ever been" (p.32-37 Investigate. April 2005). The news media responded to Tamihere's comment with scorn, selectively quoting, ignoring most. And said he had a "serious personality disorder" (National Radio, 12/4/05 11:30. Why not call themselves "Labour Radio"). Clark claimed Tamihere was drunk, and ordered him on 'stress leave' demanding an apology.
Indeed, Labour's Electoral Finance Bill was to stop 'the religious right' speaking out on moral issues at election time.
Alcohol.
Another plague in this country, worshipped like a god.
History documents mans struggle with alcohol - 1750, 1829 and 1930's. In every country alcohol behaves like a 'curse'. Nothing has changed today, but attitudes.
Any government soft on alcohol invites trouble for “Crime and alcohol go hand in hand". It's fruit is, “vandalism, harassment, threats, physical assault, kids out of control, intimidation, rioting, child abuse, and predatory sexual behaviour”. The cause of high levels of domestic violence.
It is not possible for our country today to solve this problem, in fact its impossible. Every year the problem gets worse cause drinkers legislate the drinking. Imagine if Heroin addicts legislated Heroin. Any restrictions are criticized and ignored. So legislation is so liberal today we have problems unheard of just 40 years ago - underage binge drinking (kids 16-13 even 10). Its the most damaging drug in the country and said to 'cause $2-3 billion dollars worth of economic and social harm each year'. In 2009 NZ consumed '300 million liters of beer'.
New Zealand does not have a minimum legal drinking age but a minimum purchase age. The Labour government of 1999 is responsible for making a mess of the lives of our children today, by lowering the drinking age to 16. They recycled the problem for the next generation. The younger, the more likely kids become addicted and greater damage. Both National and Labour signed the Death Warrant of many. Our politicians are big drinkers, with their State Funded dinners and free travel. There were silly comments in the Debating Chamber ie, ''We mustn't spoil the fun of many because of a few”. Labour's Ruth Dyson (ex-Minister for ACC) voted to lower the age and ironically was arrested for drunk-driving (yet voted back into parliament regardless).
Back then, newspaper journalists (The NZ Herald) laughed and mocked at "teetotallers", saying "the world won't end - the sky won't fall down” (NZ Herald). But it does for those killed on the roads, their families - those with a life-long addiction, victims of violence, child abuse, jail, brain damage and loss of employment. If 'prohibition doesn't work', then why not remove restrictions on 'drinking and driving'?
Multi-million dollar Liqueur lobbies convinced our tax-eager, morally literate government to change the law. Money drunk Liqueur companies say you should ‘drink moderately, so you live longer’. So logically you consume more and they profit. They are profit rich and our government tax rich, a government who has 'invested millions' of tax payer dollars in the wine industry.
But New Zealander's don't care, so 50% of kids are provided alcohol by parents, parents who love their “good bottle of wine” and their "quiet drink”. With this pathetic attitude, no wonder our media rarely blame alcohol for the ruined lives, health problems, violence, vandalism and broken families. Be sure whatever happens to the law, binge drinking will remain a long term problem and the real cost under reported.
Some government authorities do not want to stop children drinking, just drink less. They think normalization and public acceptance means drunkenness will disappear. They see no reason to protect kids or make it harder to obtain. But rather take 'soft-drinks' out of schools because of 'high sugar' levels, than stop kids drinking. Now we have 'school balls' providing alcohol for children.
Years ago the old teetotallers were right - "Making alcohol more available and accessible will increase abuse". It has and it did!! Today, "80% of prisoners have an alcohol problem". And it's "the chief cause of vitamin deficiency among civilized people..." (The Vitamin Bible). Strange how the hype over 'red wine' is silent about red grape juice.
The brainwashing ad’s on television say, "It's not the drinking, it's the way we're drinking". This is not true, because "drinking" is the problem! Drinking in moderation is not the solution to the problem; it is the main cause of it. How do people become drunk? Alcohol kills brain cells and numbs the mind (dead cells are not replaced). Once the thinking is clouded, the drinker continues drinking. In effect, television is saying, "It’s not the drug, ‘it's the way’ we're drugged"
Successive governments have legalized and liberalized excessively, TV now run shock stories about the carnage. But unlike smoking remain silent that alcohol the number one cause of Breast Cancer in women. Experts insist, "no amount of alcohol is fully safe..."
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/7906355.stm
Once liberal laws are legislated, it is almost impossible to reverse long term damage. So its a leech sucking the blood of our country and people, leaving an ugly scar.
Drinkers I challenge you. Go a day with out it. Go a week. Then make it a month. Don’t let the filthy stuff control your life. You will not be sorry. Life has enough problems, drinking solves none. God can help you break free, He has with many.
Gambling.
This country has another nightmare governments promote. Gambling: A vice once established, rings the neck of a nation and burdens it's back.
A clear sign of a superstitious people, hoping they will ‘get lucky’. It’s a religious 'love of money' - 'the root of all evil'. People who desire what is not theirs and enjoy what they never labored for (Lk.23:34).
The NEW word for gambling is 'gaming' and today all money is considered good money. Governments have appointed 'Ministers of Racing', who passed laws promoting TAB Horse Racing. So the TAB have given money promoting political parties. Labour invested 150 million in Sky Casino and gambled millions of tax payers dollars on the America's Cup (hoping to win) and lost it.
Our governments want all forms of gambling to grow. So some dirty money is legally channeled off to promote more gambling. Politicians pushed for casinos and increased all forms of gambling, to copy 'other countries', but we were never asked. There was not one street march anywhere in our country for Casinos. Politicians claimed the new liberal laws would be 'signs of a mature society' and 'good' and "make money and jobs". And good for "charities". So what happened? It increased crime, gave the country a even greater gambling problem and broken people from legalized stealing. Gamblers in a trance-like state of mind controlled by machines in a vain hope to get rich. I knew this would happen!
Our liberal left media are silent about the cost in ruined lives and broken families. In fact the bigger the gambling event the greater free publicity given by the media. Even if they sound a warning, nothing is done. So the real cost is under reported. The loser's are the gamblers, their families, their future, and our society - Only about 4.5 million people in NZ but "$1.87 billion was lost by gambling in 2003" - "$8.4 billion in 2004" - in 2005 "lost $2.027 billion through all forms of gambling".
The real social economic costs however are unknown. Now have more accessible and liberal gambling facilities - the corner book-shop, the local dairy and supermarket, while radio, TV and newspapers all encourage it. Yet charities are now complaining, they are getting less of the dirty money. Sorry but gambling will get worse in our country and keep on destroying our people. For government and media are mentally unable to see the connection between gambling, alcohol and poverty.
“A greedy person tries to get rich quick, but it only leads to poverty”. Prov.28:22.
“Such is the fate of all who are greedy for gain. It ends up robbing them of life”. Prov.1:19
The only answer is in Christ. He alone can transform the heart, and free the mind from deception. And remove the burdens that plague a soul.
Standards?
The Broadcasting Standards Authority (have no Standards)
This 'Authority' (and the Film & Literature Board of Review) has a liberal agenda. With no standards, they are slow to act, they act dumb, play games and neglect their duty. They find themselves in the High Court as a result.
Classification Office fails its statutory duties. Extremely evil videos are submitted. To them the word "objectionable" is subject to interpretation. For example "brutal sexual violence and necrophilia" are now considered "entertainment". The end result is normalization, legitimization and desensitization. In a movie if someone is brutally beaten and raped because they did this to others, it's allowed to be seen. The lesson is "just deserts are meted out" (par.131Court 28/3/02.) In 2009 the decriminalisation of porn opened a loophole allowing pornographers to target ANY AGE providing the advertisement is not pornographic in itself (Advertising Standards Authority decision (18/034 re. Vixen Direct promotional vehicle).
The pervious Chief Film Sensor, Bill Hastings (homosexual activist) "allowed more porn to pass than any other in the history of his office". Aided and supported by successive New Zealand governments on a $180-190,000 salary. For "20 YEARS" he watched extreme hard-core porn, child abuse, sexual and graphic gratuitous violence. And said, "studies show that repeated exposure to violence and sexual violence had an adverse effect on attitude..." How true. He's utterly corrupt, he bans videos considered "anti-gay". Yet in the past, his office has never had the ability to ban free speech. His inability to interpret the law correctly is clouded by his advocacy of homosexuality, and his opposition to anything that appears 'Christian'. In response to criticism he replies "I suppose everybody brings to the job a little of what they are" (Radio New Zealand, National. 11:25. 30/11/04).
Hastings became desensitized to toxic material. He denies this, but he contradicts his own claim, "the harm normally comes from a diet where you see the same kind of violent acts over and over" (Dominion Post 2/11/02). MAKE NO MISTAKE he suffered "over-exposure" and sexual sleaze doesn't worry him. The Classification Office was subject to a review and it was recommended his contract was not renewed, but it was. To those who object, he calls "intolerant, fundamentalist and bigots" (gaynz.com). Finally, (2010) he decided to quit and become a court 'judge'.
Deputy Chief Censor. For over 2 years Labour's George Hawkins failed his statutory duty recommending a Deputy Censor and was prosecuted in court. So in spite he appointed a lesbian activist as Deputy (on a $140 -105,000 salary). Her only job experience prior to this was as a teachers aid at the junior level for a short time. For 10 years she has viewed all manner of explicit material and is desensitized. She denies it - "It's a myth that watching all these horrible things makes you blasé about them. You're more likely hyper-sensitive" ('Watching the Defectives' p.5-6 The Star Times 13/8/06). So why do we need more and more?
Successive Ministers of Internal Affairs fail their statutory duties. So pleased with all this they reappoint the whole Classification Office. In all honesty, the only people really concerned about decency in this country are a few 'born again' Christians (who Prime Ministers have described as "extreme"). So taxpayers are currently subsidizing the examination, classification and registration of hundreds of sleazy hardcore porn videos every year. Why doesn't the sleaze 'industry' and distributors cover ALL costs? The millions of dollars used to subsidize the 'sex industry' should go to hospitals.
Porn works like this. Public official watches porn. Soon he is no longer shocked, he likes it. He believes there's no harm in fact, he’s ‘turned on’. He watches more. One day he announces our laws are old fashion. ‘All discrimination against homosexuals must stop’. We are shocked at this coming from an ex-conservative. This desensitized person will crusade and discriminate against anything consider pure and decent.
Today, we're drowning in sleazy literature in Gas stations, Supermarkets, Corner shops, Books shops, Video stores, TV, and Libraries. Yes our local corner milk and bread shops sell porn and encourage gambling while you buy 'milk and bread'.
And free to air TV stations (TV.1, TV.2, TV.3, Prime TV) are crusading to drown us with a continual diet of increasing filth. As if we are all perverts who can't get enough of their mindless trash. If you are dumb, you'll love "Shortland Street", it's the dumbest program to ever come out of Television New Zealand. If you don't believe anybody can be so dumb you have not met the management of TV 3. And the advertising for TV and radio is increasingly vulgar, reflecting the dirty minded idiots who write it. If TV broadcast a "Christian" program, they insist it "doesn't reflect the views of this channel". But lewd programs are relentlessly promoted and boasted it's "only on..." our channel and you "must watch". So standards will worsen destroying our country. In Queensland (Aust) they now have 'more sex shops than supermarkets' and a "dramatic rise in sex crimes committed by young children" (p.15 'The Sunday Mail' 28th Sept. 08).
Churches.
God is not welcomed in our country nor His standards in our traditional churches. The NZ Weekend Herald (B16 18-19/04) reported homosexuality as a scandal in Christianity. What nonsense, the liberal Methodist, Presbyterian and NZ Anglican churches today embrace any 'loving relationship'. The Anglican Bishop of Christchurch (Rt Rev. Victoria Mathews) wants more practicing homosexuals "in the church" and with "blessing" (p.11 Weekly Challenge 31/3/08). These churches ignore that "80% of child sexual abuse is from male homosexuals" (Labour's Lianne Dalziel MP homosexual activist 2/12/04. Parliament House).
The NZ Methodists have practicing homosexuals as licensed ministers since 1997. Almost electing a practicing Lesbian as their church "President" [2006 the Rev Diana Tana]. They formed a covenant with Anglicans, so both can promote and encourage "greater diversity of society...with the issues of sexuality". And "explore uncomfortable questions" and accept "each others members" and "ordained ministers". Methodists (2009) have decided that they will now "ordain openly gay and lesbian". Their church people can "state opposition to it but not block such ordinations" (p.11 Challenge Weekly 19/1/09).
Over one third of the NZ Presbyterian leadership are in favor of similar ordinations. Some Anglican Bishops realise the ordinations are out of control (Mar. 2007). The ordained become militant (note the militancy of this Minister of the Crown). Bishops however, are unable to stop ordinations which are after all 'outside marriage relationships'. And wrong biblically, theologically and constitutionally to start with. The bishops have allowed their churches to be over taken and "prefer schism" than a return to decency.
The "ordained" homosexual clergy develop an intolerant agenda, they (1) criticize objectors (2) preach sermons by their example (3) encourage all to embrace their 'life style'. Consistency demands churches must bless and encourage such relationships or condemn, because acceptance leads to endorsement. So sodomy, once unlawful, is welcomed in churches (ie Anglican, Methodist) once bastions of purity. Weak or immoral churches have serious consequences for social services in this country.
It was surprising to read "Anglican, Presbyterian, AOG, Brethren, Apostolic church leaders welcome brothels next to their places of worship" (p.1 Challenge Weekly 20/9/04). Yet few 'evangelical' Christians are vocal about decency. They're told 'the Church and State should be separate'... "stay out of politics". Christian you have "no right to impose your views on others". Really? So if someone steals from you, you have 'no right' to speak out? No wonder evil prospers. Atheism is a belief, which doesn't separate its religion from politics.
Look how Labour honoured Lloyd Geering. He was excommunicated by the Presbyterian General Assembly (as "a heretic" 1967) he offended many (with "doctrinal heresy"). So he received an honorary doctorate from Otago Univ. (1976). An honorary CBE (1988) and in 2006 the highest award "The Order of New Zealand". He said, "I didn't feel I'd done anything to deserve it at all". But someone did. His antiChristian beliefs were rewarded. What great social, caring organization has he started? What great advance in religious understanding? None.
Political Correctness.
Much of the New Zealand news media are so politically left its impossible to be unbiased. They don't provide all the news, at times half the story! They WILL superficially dress news and comment with a loaded agenda. On moral issues you can't believe almost anything they say. After selectively reporting, what THEY regard 'news' (in THEIR opinion) they interpret it without any balance. At times so PC its impossible for them to be honest. When presenting news, commentators & reports are always selected from the loony left. Our media never have a problem interviewing the political left. Who (by the way) are always armchair experts in hind-sight and over-simplification. And of course, they NEVER have the ANSWER to the worlds problems but given plenty of free air time..
Our news media won't embarrass some but couldn't careless for others. Eg., they wouldn't embarrass Labour's transvestite politician by a calling them a 'transvestite'. They almost never used the word. And it's remarkable they never apply the word 'homosexual' to politicians, its always 'gay'. The word 'gay' is a lie. It should be "homosexual", such people are not necessarily 'happy', why not use correct language? Don't be fooled by quaint slang, slang words deceive. While some claim to be happy, not all. Many have a persecution complex. Some were abused as kids and have a life-long mental and psychological shame. The word "victim" is selectively applied, but as adults they will sue anyone, Priest, Vicar, Church or teacher about past events, grieving over their hurt. And even as teachers, politicians, Priests, or Pastors (if not "discriminated" against) they will continue abuse to others. So the word 'gay' is a utter lie.
But why is it acceptable to offend Christians? Our national news media, TV channels, radio stations, have NEVER allowed ridicule of Islam or Maori, only Christians. They're naturally silent about Christians unless to insult. The impression is that only Christians sexually abuse children because that's all they report. In fact, the news media TV1 & TV3 [TweedleOne & TweedleThree] and newspapers gathered publicly to apologize to Muslim's if offended when covering the Muhammad Cartoon Story (6.00 TV3 News 8/2/06). But the media would NEVER apologize to Christians for offending them at ANY time, for ANY reason, about ANY thing.
$80 million" of tax payers money to help it grow. (12/06).(1) State FUNDED Owned TV1 Nov.3 2005 7.00 'Close Up'. Exclusive: TV ONE. They hid a camera crew outside a church and set-up a homosexual protestor (with a hidden microphone) to provoke those going to church. He was seeking an argument, calling-out - "hypocrites... narrow minded" etc. Church Ushers came out to move him aside from the church DOOR. The TV.1 camera crew jumped out of their hiding place, ran over with their camera rolling trying to embarrass, and criticize - "the church had no right to remove him". A TV ONE ambush calculated and contrived, the intention to publicly embarrass Christians who differ from TV ONE's sick view of morality. So pleased with TVNZ Labour gave it "
(2) Election Night 17/9/05 (9:25-30). TV3 broadcaster ridiculed "the gospel", "Jesus Christ", "God" & "Christians in politics", in a calculated and blatant 2-3 minute broadcast item (made & produced by TV3) intended to make people like me a joke and scorn. That was their views on their channel. This was the nastiest mocking of Christians I have ever seen on TV.
(3) TV One
News 1/1/2010:
New Year’s celebration report… Last night 100’s arrested… alcohol problems
but police are ‘happy’. News item: Helen Clark awarded 'The Order of New
Zealand'... TV One gushing with praise showing historical footage of her student
activism and protest years. Video showed her helping woman by speaking up for
abortion rights, and 20 seconds later suggested NZ is now a much safer place for
all... (but not the unborn?) By the way, she was also seen publicly spiting at
our troops returning home from Vietnam (this has not shown on TV for years). News item:: A
problem gambling news item… followed by a lotto add. News item: International…
Those poor misunderstood Palestinians bombed again by those nasty Israeli's.
News item: Sports… NZ's leading sports mystic makes his predictions for 2010.
(4) TV3 6.30 'Campbell Live' 1st, 2nd, 3rd, 4th Mar. 2010. TV3 broadcasts exclusive reports on 'Destiny Church' Australia (experiencing division). TV3's primary complaint? Destiny and its leaders are money hungry. Yes we all agree. Sad how some churches are money sick and others always begging. Yet a far more serious issue transpires unreported. The Waitakere City Council opens their doors and our pockets by funding and promoting homosexual orientation events with rate payers money (6th Mar. in Council buildings & parks). The Western Leader (local newspaper) offers the same free publicity. (pg.3 Feb. 25th 2010) Its one thing to attend church and give money. But its more disgraceful when YOUR local body Council decide to take YOUR rate-payers money and use it to encourage corruption in YOUR community.
TV3 briefly took on a new role as guardians of moral purity condemning Pastors who have 'extravagant' holidays. In this short role and revealing their support for Labour's transvestite, they utilized his/her hatred for Christians to broadcast their "Exclusive" criticism of a Pastor (TV3 6.00 News & TV3 News 10.00. 9/3/06). In reality, it's the broadcaster TV.3 who are the immoral hypocrites and continually dish-up never ending sickly TV programs. If there is any program indecent and filthy, TV3 will find it, buy it, advertise it, promote, it, praise it and rerun it. Any complaints? TV.3 reply 'if you don't like drunk drivers on the highway, stay off the highway'.
Another abnormally that puzzles me. Why can they never use the correct word "Allah" regarding Islamic terrorism, instead of "God"? Islam insists and demands that 'ALLAH is the one true god and Muhammad is his prophet'. They insist "There is no god but Allah". Their terror is performed in Allah's name, NOT the Jewish or Christian God.
Overseas.
I applaud America's record (at cost to themselves) bringing peace and freedom to Iraq and lay down their lives for the freedom of others. The US military remains the worlds largest and most effective mercy agency. What impressive efforts to restore/rebuild Iraq for the Iraqi people! 28 million Iraqis live in freedom today. Who do we thank? Not the media in our country, they support terrorism. Their armchair critics over emphasized an 'oil war' and "WMD's". US troops instead found massive grave yards (over 200). The coalition toppled a dictator who INVADED countries, funded TERRORISM paying families of suicide bombers who killed Israelis. Hussein had chemical and biological weapons. He used them against Iran and Kurds killing almost 200,000. Two million Kurds fled their homes from his armies. He wanted nuclear weapons (remember?) but Israel bombed his endeavor in 1980. HE HAD TO BE REMOVED.
To spare himself, he agreed to disarm weapons of mass destruction. Yet for 12 YEARS, as a threat to peace, he systematically violated that agreement pursuing intercontinental missiles. There was no evidence chemical and weapons biological were removed. Inspectors were in his country were delayed, hindered and fooled around. While camera's were illegal for Iraqis and men forced into the military.
Iraq admitted it had 3.9 tons of VX poison gas in a undisclosed location. The "Iraq Survey Group" although hindered and opposed did find "hundreds of cases of activities that were prohibited" under UN Security Council resolutions. They claimed "a clandestine network of chemical and biological weapons programs". After the invasion US troops did find (finally) tons and tons of explosives, guns, gasmasks, and ammunition. And chemicals 'camouflaged in military bunkers 6 feet under ground' that could be used to produce chemical weapons. Oh, but they 'could be used' for agricultural purposes too, so our loony left news media ignored that. Also ignored: Iraqi people uncovered mass graveyards, bodies, clothes, children's bones, and found thousands of pictures of tortured people. Iraqis claim "millions" were executed and say some graveyards will never be discovered. At his trial Hussein even said, "Iraq is full of mass graveyards".
The UN claim their Resolutions are "legally binding", but Saddam ignored them. Yet our media & MP's criticized the Iraqi liberation as an "illegal war". So which war has ever been 'a legal war'? Apparently a dictator can kill truck loads and that's 'legal'. Was gassing Kurd's, torture chambers, death squads, kidnapping children, invading Kuwait, or ignoring UN Resolutions "legal"? Was a nuclear Hussein unimportant? For years our media and government called it "the war". A silly title from a silly people. They wouldn't know what a war is. An ideological tag of convenience insulting soldiers of 1914-18. Saddam and his sons were WMD's and would be still in power today (with nuclear weapons and long range missiles) if the New Zealander media had its way!!
Month after month the Labour Party, the Greens, "Radio New Zealand National" (Labour Radio) and the NZ Herald (1) criticized the US and Bush (2) ignored the 50-100,000 Kurds gassed (3) and the torture chambers. In Baghdad one walk in off the street, sit down and watch soldiers torture 'enemies' of the state. OUR MEDIA cared nothing about "torture" until Guantanamo Bay became their fixation. OUR GOVERNMENT wouldn't lift a finger to help Iraqis. Traditionally the wooly left won't endanger their lives for anyone. If the New Zealand government were really serious about "the war", why didn't they break off diplomatic relations with Australia in protest? In hypocrisy they past a motion unanimously for the freedom of Iranian people (23/6/09) which they never past for Iraqis. They are a shame and disgrace.
It was priceless to see Blair, Bush and Howard resolute and united. But disgraceful for Helen Clark to insult President Bush and refuse to apologize, just express regret. Imagine if Bush was successful and democratic movements spread throughout the region?
No one wanted war when Hitler reoccupied the Rhineland (but he could have been stopped, then in 1936). And stopped in 1938 after marching into Austria, and even in 1939 when invading Poland. German Generals insisted Hitler could have been stopped then, 'with a few weeks of sudden and sustained aggression'. But no! Not until May 1940 after breaking through the Ardenne was war fully realized (too late). If a dictator loves big armies, and invades other countries, do nothing and learn a painful lesson.
The nameless New Zealand Herald Editor revealed their ignorance by condemning the US regarding Hussein's execution. Why are these people so stupid? Because our loony left government and news media ARE anti-American, anti-Israel... anti-Christian... anti-Bush... anti-nuclear (?)... anti-smacking AND YET pro-abortion - homosexual, alcohol, gambling, prostitution, Islam and feminism.
Our news media are STILL angry today (2010) with the coalition against terrorism and STILL broadcast one-sided news reports. Apparently this became the longest "war" in human history, but now its officially over. Yes not until 2009 our media finally stopped using the title 'War in Iraq'. So where were you when the 'war ended'? Our news media cared nothing for the death of US soldiers, but displayed a 'non-judgmental' almost devilish attitude toward terrorism. Bush was the best President since Lincoln, Blair since Churchill, but Helen Clark was the worst Prime Minister in living history.
Yes New Zealander's LOVE a loony left government. And the more wicked, the better they like it. Whenever Clark uttered a word the media jumped to broadcast it. The average New Zealander is a simple chap, long as he can go to the supermarket and drive his car around, he doesn't think. Or ask the big questions about life. Money is King in this land, and that's all that matters. So we get the government we deserve.
At home
6,000 submissions were made against the Civil Union Bill, 91% against it. That's right! How did you guess? - the Labour government ignored them. They didn't give a toss. They appointed a homosexual Head of their committee to change the law. 23rd August in Wellington "10,000 Christians" marched on Parliament protesting the 'civil union bill' (homosexual marriage by another name). 'We are allowed to march but I'm sure the Government would love to stop us' (News Talk ZB radio). The marchers supported the rights of children, for traditional parents and marriage - man and woman. The PM 'Helen Clark' said they have "extreme views" (TV.1 News 6.00 23/8/04) Few politicians took notice, but two from Labour exploded with anger on the steps of Parliament shouting a tirade of insults at the "Christians". The news media focused on the clothes of Pastor Brian Tamaki (the march spokesman) and ignored the male politician swearing/cursing the marchers, wearing woman's clothes (Georgina Transvestite Beyer - Labour Party).
The left-wing news media (TV1 & TV3) endeavored to discredit the march. Any news-junky knows a twisted story. TV1 and TV3 gave us a disgraceful and selective news report. The man calling the Christians "Nazis" and "fascists" was an old friend of the Labour Party homosexual Tim Barnett. He traveled from Christchurch to Wellington against the march. TV1/TV3 interviewed him, but wouldn't allow the marchers a word. And didn't broadcast the organized protest against the march, so people could see their spitting, 'finger' signs and swearing.
In contrast TV3's News coverage of the "hikio" Maori march up Queen St., gave the kindest possible report they never gave the 'Christian' march in 2004. These reports viewed together reveal the massive hypocrisy within the TV3 News room (TV.3 25/5/2009 6.00 news).
Another march for family values in Auckland 5/3/05 about '15,000'. A few tried to stop the march, by blocking Queen Street and shouting obscenities. Some were arrested & women bared their breasts, likely the only reason they were shown the news item. But the New Zealand Herald (front-page) was so "one-sided", people complained to the Editor for weeks afterwards (even 15th March). They said calling it "one sided would be too polite". They called it "ridiculous reporting", "aimed at discrediting the march", "a slanderous article". One wrote "I wonder what event reporters were reporting on". What's annoying is that "The New Zealand Herald" would be the first to criticize Christians if they committed any offense. In time the Herald paper is past news, but this will stay on the internet for years. Think about that, Herald Editor.
The Answer
There was a time in New Zealand murder was shocking. No longer, 2006 was called "the year of murders". Things that once concerned us don't any more. Some agree there is evil today, but our society can't even agree on what's 'wicked'. Kid's are growing up accepting evil as normal. We have just started on a down hill slope, things are going to get REAL bad in our country. In the years to come standards will continue down hill.
Regardless, 'our society' is everything we would expect based on what the bible says about the fallen nature in man. 'Our people' have rejected our Creator, and don't know Him. The further away, the worse society becomes, more confusion abounds, the less meaning life has. The one underlying problem is a 'spiritual problem'. All have a tendency towards evil. Recognizing this is the first step, knowing the answer the second, and third taking action. There is only one action to take. What's your answer to the problem? I know the One who is the Answer.